Among the 225 high profile people invited to Wednesday’s White House state dinner for Chinese President Hu, one stood out for anyone hoping to see progress from China on respecting human rights.
None other than Kenneth Roth, the President of Human Rights Watch — one of China’s most persistent NGO critics — got one of the treasured invites for the glittering event. Less than a week ago, Human Rights Watch gave China a failing grade for showing a lack of progress in upholding citizen rights. The Obama Administration, hoping to show respect for the Chinese leader and, in return, obtain concessions, or at least the start of concessions, on a wide range of critical policy differences, rolled out the red carpet, the exquisite crystal glassware and cutlery, and a quintessential American menu. In subdued and elegant formal wear, the two leaders proffered several toasts on prosperity, friendship and continuing dialogue.
It was an impressive, glittering evening, a carefully staged and highly public event in which nations communicate to each other in sometimes subtle, sometimes blunt language, all encased in pomp and circumstance.
The presence of Roth on the guest list was an umistakable message from our government to its Chinese counterparts: get serious on curbing human rights abuses. Roth played his part to the hilt. Asked why he thought he had been invited to the soiree, Roth replied, “I was invited as a statement to President Hu.”
None of this may may end up doing anything to cause the Chinese to ease up on the government’s restrictions on civil and political rights. Up to now, the country has shown little inclination to even respond to its critics, other than to suggest, often with a sneer, that how political protest is dealt with in China is an “internal matter” that is no business of other nations.
Still, one can hope that President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Administration’s China team have secured at least the start of a progressive step from the Chinese on human rights, and on a host of other issues in which Beijing often acts like a petulant teenager, according to many diplomatic observers. On human rights, Hu — for the first time — signaled a tentative willingness to at least consider respecting citizen rights.
In a report by the New York Times, Hu said at a White House news conference that China “recognizes and also respects the universality of human rights,” a palpable shift for a government that has staged a two-year crackdown on internal dissent and imprisoned a Nobel laureate. Until Wednesday, the Times report continued, recognizing credos like democracy and human rights as “universal values” had been all but taboo in Chinese political discourse, although China has signed the United Nations convention that enshrines the principle of universal human rights.
Words, of course, are easier than deeds. “I don’t equate new rhetoric with new reality in China,” said Kenneth G. Lieberthal, a Brookings Institution scholar who was President Bill Clinton’s national security adviser on China issues. “But at least new rhetoric is better than nothing.”
All of this is encouraging, if it leads to a more open society in China, and among other reforms a crackdown on widespread human trafficking and forced labor practices within the vast nation. A good starting point would be the release of Liu Xiaobo, the Nobel Prize laureate and political activist who languishes in prison as the leader of the Chinese government clangs crystal with the American President.